Pennsylvania governor joins fight over data center power costs

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro has asked state regulators to let him join a consumer advocate’s complaint against PPL Electric Utilities, arguing that the utility’s current rates do not protect its roughly 1.5 million customers from costs and outage risks tied to a wave of new data centers.

Key takeaways

Shapiro filed a petition on Oct. 15 to intervene in a Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) case brought by the state’s Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) against PPL; his office says it is the first time in at least 15 years a governor has done so.
The complaint asks for a separate rate class for large data centers, so they pay for the grid upgrades and reliability programs their demand requires, and are curtailed first in a grid emergency.
Nothing changes on bills yet. The case is at an early stage, and PPL’s current default supply price of 13.147 cents per kWh runs through Nov. 30.

What happened

On Oct. 2, Pennsylvania’s Office of Consumer Advocate, the state agency that represents residential utility customers, filed a formal complaint with the PUC (docket C-2026-3065756). It argues that PPL’s rates, customer classes and procedures are “unjust and unreasonable” because they were not designed for the scale of data center growth now arriving in eastern and central Pennsylvania.

The numbers in the complaint explain the concern. According to the filing, PPL told the regional grid operator PJM in late September that it expects about 12,764 megawatts of additional large load by 2030, and its advanced-stage data center pipeline totals roughly 31.8 gigawatts by 2034. The complaint also warns that transmission limits and a regional shortage of power supply could compromise service as early as July 1, 2027.

On Oct. 15, Shapiro petitioned to become a formal party, which would let his administration present evidence and legal arguments. He backs four main changes: a separate customer class for large data centers, stronger requirements for them to fund the transmission upgrades they need, a share of the cost of PJM’s reliability and backup supply programs, and safeguards for existing customers if supply falls short. “Pennsylvanians should not be left paying higher electric bills because of data center developers,” Shapiro said in a statement.

PPL said it is committed to making sure large-load customers pay the costs they create. It points to its Rate LP-6, approved by the PUC in June as part of a rate case settlement, which it describes as the state’s only approved large-load tariff. Under LP-6, new large customers must sign 10-year commitments, pay for dedicated infrastructure and post financial security, and from 2027 they will contribute $11 million a year toward low-income assistance. PPL has also filed a separate transmission rider, still under PUC review, to assign certain upgrade costs to large-load customers. PPL has 20 days from the complaint to file a written response, and the PUC has not yet ruled on the governor’s petition.

What it means for your bill

For now, nothing. A complaint like this can take many months, and any rate changes would come only after the PUC rules. But the case goes to the heart of how future costs are split between households and very large new customers.

Start with what a typical PPL household pays today. If you take default service, the supply part of your bill is the “price to compare”: 13.147 cents per kWh from June 1 through Nov. 30, 2026. For a home using 1,000 kWh a month:

Supply: 1,000 kWh × $0.13147 = $131.47 a month
Delivery (distribution) charges come on top. A July 1 rate increase added about $7.42 a month at that usage level, and published estimates put total delivery charges at roughly $65 to $70 a month for an average home.

Now consider the costs at stake. The complaint cites one hyperscale data center project where PPL planned to assign about $156.9 million of $178.4 million in estimated network upgrades to its broader customer base. As a rough illustration only: $156.9 million ÷ 1.5 million customers ≈ $105 per customer, which would be recovered gradually through rates over many years rather than in a single bill. Real allocations differ between homes and businesses, and that is exactly what the PUC will examine.

Supply prices matter too. According to the complaint, wholesale capacity costs in the region rose from $6.39 to $19.61 per megawatt-hour between the first halves of 2025 and 2026. Those costs feed into the price to compare. Every 1 cent per kWh increase in that price adds $10 a month, or $120 a year, to a 1,000 kWh household. If data centers are assigned more of these costs, the pressure on household rates could ease; if not, it may continue.

What you can do

Watch for the Dec. 1 price change. PPL resets its price to compare every six months. When the new figure is published, compare it with fixed-rate offers on the state’s official PA Power Switch website, and read contract terms carefully for cancellation fees and variable rates.
Check your bill line by line. Know which part is supply and which is delivery, since only supply can be shopped. Our guide on how to read your electric bill walks through it.
Smooth out winter spikes. Budget billing spreads costs evenly across the year; see our explainer on budget billing pros and cons.
Ask about assistance. Income-eligible customers can apply for PPL’s OnTrack program and for federal LIHEAP heating aid through Pennsylvania’s Department of Human Services.

Sources

Written by The Daily Economy editorial team with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Read our editorial policy.

Settings

Appearance

Text size

Language

My country

✉ News in your inbox